> > lets look at a typical module > > on the discontinued list, the MOTM-850. > > > > I have sold 5 of these in the last *year*. > > That's too bad, because I consider real-time control to be an absolutely > necessary part of any synth. Everyone should buy two of these. I'm guessing that the problem is that there isn't a consensus about which modules are "absolutely necessary"--or rather, anything that's on the the discontinued list does not have such a consensus. The 300 is not on the list because it's absolutely necessary to most people. On the other hand, I posted a message in support of the 700, someone else posted an impassioned vote for the 820, and you submit that everyone should have two 850s. I have a 38-module system; I very rarely use my one 820 and I don't have an 850 at all because it's never looked useful to me. "Different strokes..." It's a pretty simple aspect of running business: if you have a product that doesn't sell well, you stop selling it and use the resources (inventory space, inventory capital, R&D, etc.) for other products. Regardless of what we individual customers may consider to be absolutely necessary, only Paul is in a position to evaluate which products are worth continuing and which should be dropped. It's also very easy (as a customer) to overlook the factor of having to purchase PC boards, panels, etc. in batches. We purchase modules a few at a time. Paul purchases PCBs for one module 50 at a time. Once he explained this to me I had a somewhat better understanding of what the business looks like from his perspective. A module that doesn't sell well can't be carried indefinitely; it just doesn't make sense to do so. (I developed a somewhat greater appreciation of these issues after I got into the retail business myself, but it's simpler for me because the things I sell are delivered to me in finished form. I'm just a reseller, which is a whole lot simpler than being a developer and manufacturer. Given my experiences Synth Tech looks mind-bogglingly complex from a business standpoint. But I digress.) --Adam
Message
RE: [motm] Status of discussed future modules
2006-07-05 by Adam Schabtach
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.