Again, I agree whole-heartedly. I may end up building/buying other modular gear, but I'd rather have the option of NOT having to do so. More features=more money? Fine by me. David. > But, I do not agree with the general concept that feature > reduction because > of incremental cost increases should be an icon of MOTM design.
Message
RE: Phaser size
1999-12-01 by David Bivins