At 08:43 AM 4/4/2006 -0500, Paul Schreiber wrote: >> Sounds like it. The Oddysey did it by setting one oscillator to respond >> to the high note and one to the low note. So if you hit only one key, >> you got both, but if you hit more than that, the highest went to one, >> the lowest to the other. Will unison do that high/low allocation? >> When you're using two similar oscillators, it's no big deal, but when >> one is FMing, ring modulating, or synched to the other, that's where >> the magic happens and why it's important that one is consistantly high >> and one consistantly low. Did that explain it? > >Yes, I need to check with the programmer if the stealing is the based on >position (hi/lo) or not. All of the polyphonic modes allocate voices based on order played. Poly1, Poly2, and Unison give priority to the first N notes played (where N = the total number of voices). This is the way almost every polysynth ever made works. The various Steal modes (Poly1 St., Poly2 St., & Unison St.) give priority to the last N notes played. To answer the original question, it's easy to make one voice consistently high and one consistently low by playing consistently. A quick roll of the fingers will make either the low or the high notes first. I'm not a very good player, but I've been able to get consistent results doing this w/ an arpeggiator that played notes based on order. Jeffrey
Message
Re: Unison Steal
2006-04-04 by J.D. McEachin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.