On 3/30/06, ivancu2 put forth: >As mentioned, MOTM outputs are unbalanced and substantially higher >than normal "pro" line-level outputs. No, they aren't. On 3/30/06, Paul Schreiber put forth: >MOTM uses very large signals on the outputs: 10V pk-pk which is something like >+24dBu > >Most "studio" gear uses +4 dBu which I think is like 1.5V pk-pk. Actually, most studio gear is more or less 22V pk-pk, which is 20dBu. Admittedly, the designation "+4 dBu" is a bit misleading. MOTM is 10V pk-pk which is around 13dBu. Which isn't as significant a difference as one might think. MOTM is quite compatible with most line-level gear. The only exception might be the MOTM-120. I don't have one myself, but I have read numerous complaints over the years that it isn't hot enough. >Mics need balanced cables because their outputs are in *microvolts* to say 5mv >(that's 0.005V). > >Since the 'driving' signal is so small, any hum or noise is *relatively >significant*. This is true. Imho, the advantage of using balanced interconnects for line level over the typically short distances in most studios isn't the common mode rejection, but that its consistent implementation prevents ground loops and provides better level matching. On 3/29/06, Charles Stella put forth: >The proper way to unbalance a balanced line is not to drop ground >but to tie Pin 3 (XLR) or the Ring (TRS) to ground. Which is what generally happens when one uses a TS cable with balanced TRS jacks, however there are instances (eg. you are using a one-conductor cable with equipment with mismatched grounds) where it is preferable to float the ring even though it causes a 6dB loss in signal. The ideal solution in going from TRS to TS would be to use a 2-conductor cable where the signal ground (the ring) is connected to the the sleeve of the TS, and the TRS sleeve is connected to the cable shield but is left unconnected at the TS end. Although that usually isn't necessary. >When you plug a balanced TRS cable into your MOTM the Ring connector >is automatically grounded so there's no need to make a special cable. I do not think that is true. Although, with good equipment the sleeve is still grounded (to the chassis) at both ends so it should still work, even though it is not the best way since you are ignoring the signal ground. However, be warned, there is equipment out there with floating unbalanced TRS jacks where the sleeve is not connected. While these sort of bullshit balanced connectors will work if you use a TRS cable to connect to a TRS jack that does have its ring and sleeve connected, and will also work if you use a TS cable, they will not work properly if you use a TRS cable to connect to a TS jack such as MOTM. (Oddly enough, it doesn't seem to occur to the manufacturers that the shield remains completely unconnected when using TRS cable to connect these pseudo-balanced TRS connections together!!) Almost all equipment with TRS jacks is made with the expectation that someone will stick a regular TS plug into it at some time or another. So I strongly recommend using regular TS cables to connect MOTM to balanced TRS, and only trying other options if noise or other problems occur.
Message
[motm] Re: How to connect balanced signals to the MOTM
2006-03-31 by Mark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.