I stand by what I said. A direct box converts unbalanced line-levels to a balanced mic-level output. That is its job. Look up the Jensen JT-DB-E transformer; it has 12:1 turns ratio. Active direct boxes do essentially the same thing. High input impedance, ATTENUATION, low output impedance. And while they may work backwards, they typically don't work WELL backwards unless designed to do so. Active direct boxes do not work backwards, period. Yes, there are line interfaces that balance and unbalance line-level signals; typically to provide interface between nominally +4dBu balanced and -10 dBu unbalanced connections. And yes, there are preamplifier/direct box combinations (like the Avalon U5) that offer a line-level preamplified output and also a mic-level "direct box" output. As mentioned, MOTM outputs are unbalanced and substantially higher than normal "pro" line-level outputs. No problem for most pro gear with line-level inputs. But if you attenuate it to take it into something like a guitar stomp box, then you must amplify the signal coming out of the stomp box to come back into the MOTM. There are "reamping" type of boxes out there which is sort of in line with this subject, but again they're made to deal with pro audio gear, not MOTM signal levels. For lots more on this general subject read up on the Jensen Transformer and Rane website; highly recommended reading. Ivan --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, ivancu@... wrote: > > Don't use a direct box. Most direct boxes will take a line-level input > and attenuate it to mic level. You WANT a high-level line input going > to the MOTM. > > A balanced signal can drive an unbalanced input just fine, although you > might have some signal loss depending on the balanced output topology. > It should be minimal and not cause any problems though. > > Ivan >
Message
Re: How to connect balanced signals to the MOTM
2006-03-30 by ivancu2
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.