MOTM

> From: JWBarlow@...
> My thought was the MOTM module might benefit
> from some additional front panel features as Dave 
> Bradley had mentioned in his reference to a "studley"
> VC lag processor. 

As always, I vote for the "studley" version.
 
> My continuing references to the reversing attenuator for the VC Lag
module 
> are due to my reliance on that pot on the DSG -- just swinging it from
about 
> the 1 O'clock to 11 O'clock positions can dramatically change the
personality 
> of a patch and the direction one takes as a result. Of course one could
have 
> a separate reversing attenuator and patch it in to see if it is useful in

> that particular circumstance, and then unpatch it and patch in the proper
CV 
> (positive or negative) and use it in another place. In my experience,
this 
> would be one of the most advantageous places for a reversing attenuator.

You are no doubt correct John.  I think that would indeed be a cool feature
on the UP & DOWN CV control.  And, if you insist, on the others too.  :)

LH