> >In a message dated 11/29/99 10:43:45 AM, daveb@... writes: > >RE: Up & down rate pots - 2 ways to go here are that pots switch to become > >attenuators on the jax, or pots remain offset level and jax are > >unattenuated. I'd probably prefer the latter, although it's a close call. > From: JWBarlow@... > Once again, Bradley is WRONG! > You need one initial rate pot for each (rise and fall) segment of the glide. > You also need VC jacks and pots (attenuators), as well as a common VC jack > (controlling both rise and fall times simultaneously) which MUST have a > reversing attenuator. I would think this (and on VC EGs) is an even more > important place for the reversing attenuator than the VCF (which I really > like as well). 1. Once again JWB is only 1/2 right <stooge snicker>. I'll go with Dave here "prefer the latter" that the "UP Rate and DOWN Rate" pots remain offset level and jax unattenuated. At some point we have to say "OK, I need a reversing attenuator" as a separate module so that every single module that Paul makes does not have to have DC attenuation as part of the design. I can't see two pots on every MOTM module DC input, one for initial and one for attenuation. 2. Now, to argue with myself (since I know everyone else will chime in too). Looking at the former MOTM modules (like the 410 for example) it seems that initial pots do become attenuators once a CV in inserted. so, maybe from a consistency of application, that is the right answer (Dave said it was a close call). 3. Now, to support John's weak argument, some VC inputs do deserve BOTH attenuation and initial (PWM on the VCO). I think an argument can be made for any of the three. If I had to pick, 3 would be the most control assuming the two extra pots don't expand the size (knowing they will already significantly expand the cost). However, picking between 1 and 2 I would go with Dave B's close call and pick # 1. Since John may feel picked on right now, I like the idea that the single UP & DOWN pot is a reverse attenuator CV when CV source is plugged. Larry (don't call me a diplomatic stooge) Hendry
Message
Re: No more guessing!
1999-11-30 by J. Larry Hendry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.