MOTM

Thanks.   I did hear from Ken.  Thought it was copied to the list.  
After hearing the effect of the graphic EQ on the patchbook drums, I am 
going to look into a multi-effect processor.  It will be part of my 
enhanced recording environment eventually.  I have a lot of research to 
do on these.

-Richard

Mike Marsh wrote:

>You probably wanted to hear from Ken, but here are a few suggestions
>anyway:
>
> * Roland SE-50 (noisy but cool) or SE-70 (more 'modern')
> * Lexicon sells several budget but great sounding rack devices (MX?)
> * Carvin sells a GREAT unit very cheap
> * Guitar multi-effects (BOSS, Korg, take your pick) work really well
>on synths
>
>Mike
>
>--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
>  
>
>>Can you mention some actual "multi-effect" devices and send links?  I'm 
>>assuming these are stand-alone processors of the rack-mounted sort.
>>
>>-Richard Brewster
>>
>>Kenneth Elhardt wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>2. There are no MOTM modules currently available for creating complex
>>>formants as required.<<
>>>
>>>Right.  Addressing coyoteous here.  Some modulars have parametric EQ,
>>>graphic EQ, delay, phaser, chorus, and filter bank modules.  MOTM
>>>      
>>>
>does not.
>  
>
>>>Those are legitimate and much needed modules for doing many things,
>>>      
>>>
>so I
>  
>
>>>don't consider them outboard gear so much.  If you have a multi-effects
>>>device, you may already have most of that stuff already in a single
>>>      
>>>
>unit.
>  
>
>>>Plus, it is a lot less expensive buying a separate graphic EQ than if
>>>synthtech were to put one behind a panel and sell it.  And in the used
>>>market some people are almost giving them away.  Plus the EQ can be
>>>      
>>>
>removed
>  
>
>>>in those patches.  The filters could be altered, or other ones added.
>>>Whatever gets you to the sound you want is all that is important in
>>>      
>>>
>the end.
>  
>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>  
>