MOTM

Hi,
thanks for that note.
I'm a bit indecisive at the moment, I'll see ...

   cheerio, Michael.

Koos Fockens wrote:

> The 87 is indeed obsolete, the range now comprises of the 187, 189. There are other 
> good testers around, and if you are not a pro, then you could save yourself some money. It 
> has to be said though that a Fluke is extremely reliable and sturdy. Better still, working on 
> industrial systems where the voltages (and currents) are , well ehh very powerful, it is 
> good to know that the thing will if you have it on the wrong range by mistake....
> 
> Koos
> 
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Zacherl (aka TonTaub) " <egroups@...> wrote:
> 
>>
>>Thanks for that pointer - unfortunately I can't find it here overseas :-/
>>
>>    Michael.
>>
>>John Loffink wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I highly recommend the Extech Multimaster 560 - better precision at lower
>>>cost than Tektronix or Fluke.
>>>
>>>John Loffink
>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
>>>>Michael Zacherl (aka TonTaub)
>>
>> >>
>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>I just browsed the tutorial http://www.synthtech.com/tutor/tutor1.html
>>>>
>>>>Paul advises a good DVM and refers to his Fluke 87.
>>>>
>>>>Is that the predecessor of the current model 187?
>>>>Is it still recommendable? (I'd say "yes")
>>>>
>>>>I'm in the market for a new, good DMM (DVM for a lifetime so to speak),
>>>>hence my question.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>