MOTM

I would like a clock on the module...

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "djthomaswhite" <djthomaswhite@h...> wrote:
>
> Hey all, firstly, overall great discussion! The list has been super 
> active and I have learned a lot from what has been said!
> 
> The 730 Pulse Divider will offer us all of the subdivisions and even 
> more by the sound of it. I would like to vote "for" the inclusion of 
> a "clock" on the module with an output jack. This would save me from 
> an LFO and the S&H effects would be in sync with my master clock as 
> it would be located on the same module. Just my thought on the issue,
> 
> Thomas
> www.naturalrhythmmusic.com/gear.html
> 
> 
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "elle_webb" <elle_webb@h...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Tkacs, Ken" <ken.tkacs@j...> wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree that the internal clock is an easy candidate for cutting 
> if more
> > > panel space is needed. Most modulars end up with a dozen or more 
> LFOs
> > > anyway, and if you look at this module as something that you 
> might want
> > > to own several of, daisy-chained, then the clocks on the 
> downstream
> > > modules become wasted.
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > "Modularize the module."
> > 
> > It might be interesting to have a more powerful Master clock module
> > that could be used to drive S&H's or other modules.
> > 
> > It would be nice to have a clock that could output a variety of
> > subdivisions, like 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, etc, via individual jacks.
> > You'd have a rate knob, and then outputs with clocks at various
> > subdivisions. 
> > 
> > That way doing things like running a couple of S&H's with 3 pulses
> > against 4, in sync, would be a piece of cake.
> > 
> > For rhythmic music, having a powerful clock controller seems like 
> it
> > would be more useful than having multiple less powerful internal 
> clocks.
> >
>