--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Tkacs, Ken" <ken.tkacs@j...> wrote:
that could be used to drive S&H's or other modules.
It would be nice to have a clock that could output a variety of
subdivisions, like 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, etc, via individual jacks.
You'd have a rate knob, and then outputs with clocks at various
subdivisions.
That way doing things like running a couple of S&H's with 3 pulses
against 4, in sync, would be a piece of cake.
For rhythmic music, having a powerful clock controller seems like it
would be more useful than having multiple less powerful internal clocks.
>It might be interesting to have a more powerful Master clock module
> I agree that the internal clock is an easy candidate for cutting if more
> panel space is needed. Most modulars end up with a dozen or more LFOs
> anyway, and if you look at this module as something that you might want
> to own several of, daisy-chained, then the clocks on the downstream
> modules become wasted.
>
>
>
> "Modularize the module."
that could be used to drive S&H's or other modules.
It would be nice to have a clock that could output a variety of
subdivisions, like 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, etc, via individual jacks.
You'd have a rate knob, and then outputs with clocks at various
subdivisions.
That way doing things like running a couple of S&H's with 3 pulses
against 4, in sync, would be a piece of cake.
For rhythmic music, having a powerful clock controller seems like it
would be more useful than having multiple less powerful internal clocks.