Well, I hate to open this can of worms (mixer) again, BUT, it always generates some interesting and informative discussion. Has anyone else checked out the Blacet site lately? I thought his mixer was certainly thought provoking. Seems that each input has gain both directions apparently with 180 degree phase reversal in one direction of the knob. So, looks like the mixer kind of doubles as a inverting attenuator / maybe with gain. Anyway, I can see the advantage and handiness of having the inverter (separate). However, I wonder how / why one might choose to invert the phase of one of the signals being input to a mixer. The only thing that comes to mind is the cancellation that could be achieved between the common parts of two signals. Some of you guys enlighten me please. And what is the scoop with the "bias" control? When I think of bias, I think of setting the mid point of the range where the signal rides on the input of an amplifier. Back in my old tube days, the correct bias would assure that you were operating on the linear portion (or not, if that was your choice) of the tube's characteristic (input voltage to output current). Seems like, on solid state, biasing off a center desirable point would just result in ugly distortion. What am I missing here? Well, I am not promoting the Blacet product here on the MOTM list, but since many MOTM modules are centered around the "best" of some other good designs, it seems appropriate to bring up what is at least a new feature on a mixer to me. Larry Hendry
Message
Mixer again
1999-11-28 by J. Larry Hendry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.