MOTM

Yes, neato, and you could also have the input of each stage available
in case you want to use each as separate S&H's.  

BTW, I meant Paul Schreiber in my original post (who the hell is Paulk
anyway?)...*sigh* I suck at typing.

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "john mahoney" <jmahoney@g...> wrote:
>
> Cool.
> 
> You could have a clock input for each S&H. They'd be normalled
together in a
> chain, so they normally all run in sync, but you could patch in multiple
> clocks for different effects.
> --
> john
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mike Marsh" <michael_marsh@m...>
> To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 4:37 PM
> Subject: [motm] New Module suggestion
> 
> 
> > Hey All -
> >
> > I've been thinking about a new module; maybe Paulk would be interested
> > in something like this?
> >
> > The idea is a number (3? 4?) of cascaded S&H units with the input of
> > one normalled to the output of the previous unit.  Each 'step' has
> > it's own out.  THis is similar, I think, to Ken Stones ASR.
> >
> > I've modeled it using software modulars (I don't have enough S&H
> > modules in my rack) and it sounds very interesting.  I'll post a
> > sample if folks are interested.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Mike
> >
>