Paul Haneberg wrote: >The Stooge name stands for quality. We wouldn't want any bad looking >panels getting out there. It could damage the vaunted stooge >reputation. > > Well, don't put any reference to "stooge" on it ;-) No seriously, I don't see any harm in selling - let's call it "lesser quality" - products to someone that "asks" for it? I live in one of the most polluted area's around the globe and I hate to see something useful turn into waste... And than there is the economic advantage too... But that's just my 0.02 and I understand your point of view. I have no experience whatsoever in running a business so I leave it up to you.. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Tom > > >-----Original Message----- >From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of >Tom Adam >Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 12:00 PM >To: Paul Haneberg >Cc: motm@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [motm] My initial take on the panel discussion > >Paul Haneberg wrote: > > > >>We will be experimenting with this as well. >> >> >> >>Paul H. >> >> >> >When experimenting I would think that you guys would try to make a real >panel. >I suggest you try making one of those Neural Agonizer panels. Even if >the paint or lettering is terribly wrong, I still would like that panel >;-) > >ToAd > > > -- Tom Adam The Big Ear http://users.pandora.be/the-big-ear/ Check out the download section!
Message
Re: [motm] My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-03 by Tom Adam
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.