In a message dated 3/14/99 2:41:58 PM, jlarryh@... writes: >And quite >frankly, unless I am missing the obvious, "would one absolutely require >a >master output control?" I actually would dispute this. In a number of circumstances your output is being patched into an attenuating input, so the output level is redundant in that instance; however, there will be that occasional time where you'll need it and so it's worth it. My idea one more time: 1) one 3 position switch to determine if the output level only affects OUTPUT1, OUTPUT2, or BOTH (middle position). 2) One two position switch to determine if the mixer is in 6X1, or 2X(3X1) mode. 3) If the input from 1 is normalled to input 4, but the mixer is in the 2X(3X1) mode, then you have one input going to two level controls (1,4), through a dual ganged master output level, to two separate outputs (STEREO). You don't have a PAN control, just a LEFT and RIGHT level control for each input. In the same way normal 2 to 5, and 3 to 6, for three input stereo output. Isn't that the idea Dave? A picture is worth a thousand words! JB
Message
Re: Mixer confusion
1999-03-15 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.