Kester Flux #331, 0.020 diameter. I buy it from Allied. Paul S. ----- Original Message ----- From: J. Larry Hendry <jlarryh@...> To: <motm@onelist.com> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 11:31 PM Subject: Re: [motm] Electrolytic Cap Placement & Solder > From: "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@...> > > Speaking of solder..... Paul what solder do you buy for "organic?" Since > I know you are Mr. Mouser, I bet you have a Mouser page number or part > number for it. > > Thanks, > LH > > > > From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> > > > > There are two reasons MOTM does not use rosin core solder (in fact, no > one > > has used rosin-core solder > > *in mass production* since about 1990). > > > > #1 - rosin is designed to *attract moisture* (think of the rosin bag in > > baseball, and in gymnastics). Attracting > > moisture in *NOT* what we want in synths! Especially VCOs. > > > > #2 - in order to *remove* the rosin off the boards, you need *horribly > > messy* chemicals. Freon was the older > > choice. There are spray cans of non-CFC rosin flux remover, but my > > experience is that this makes a huge > > mess because all you do is dissolve the flux and coat the whole pcb with > it! > > In production lines in the '70s/'80s > > there were massive, high-power water jets that 'scrubbed' the flux off > with > > 150 psi water nozzels after a good old Freon > > bath (the boards were actually immersed in liquid Freon). > > > > Today, *all* soldering is using "No Clean" flux. > > > > So, a fair question is :"Why not use No Clean everywhere?" > > > > The answer is that I felt that No Clean is harder to solder, and that > > organic *still* has the best overall > > joint construction. The only reason No Clean replaced organic is that the > > manufacturers saved millions > > of dollars on water bills (and floor space!). > > > > Paul S. > > >
Message
Re: Electrolytic Cap Placement & Solder
1999-11-21 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.