Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] Re: Possible strange question about SMT

2005-08-18 by Larry David

> What everyone has to realize this that "just idle speculation" turns 
> into
> "absolute fact"
> on the freakin' Internet. So, unless you have a EE degree, *DON''T 
> SPECULATE*.

I see your point Paul.  "Internet legends" can be really destructive.  
No one here wants that (and if they do we'll put the beat-down on em 
:).  I have a couple EE degrees, so I'll speculate for the last time on 
this topic:  MOTM has a reputation for using the highest quality parts 
and producing the highest quality product.  You've been criticized in 
the past for going too far in this regard - I think you have a long way 
to go in the other direction before anyone could seriously suggest that 
MOTM quality is not up to snuff.  I mean what is the competition doing? 
  You can bet they are all going to SMT too, if that is the way the 
larger electronics industry is going/has gone.  So if people don't want 
MOTM because it uses SMT, they 'll have nowhere else to go.  This is of 
course setting aside the whole question of whether SMT is a "bad thing" 
in the first place - which no one here has suggested, to my knowledge.

>
> Crap, next I'll hear about changing wire color effects VCF resonance 
> or some BS.

Oh that's silly - but if you put green paint on the edge of your CDs 
they sound *waaayyyy* better!  Dude!  Try it - you'll see!

>
> Paul S.
> I told you I was having a bad day


SMT rocks!  MOTM rocks!!  :)

Larry D.
Will never mention SMT again, ever.  :-)

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.