> What everyone has to realize this that "just idle speculation" turns > into > "absolute fact" > on the freakin' Internet. So, unless you have a EE degree, *DON''T > SPECULATE*. I see your point Paul. "Internet legends" can be really destructive. No one here wants that (and if they do we'll put the beat-down on em :). I have a couple EE degrees, so I'll speculate for the last time on this topic: MOTM has a reputation for using the highest quality parts and producing the highest quality product. You've been criticized in the past for going too far in this regard - I think you have a long way to go in the other direction before anyone could seriously suggest that MOTM quality is not up to snuff. I mean what is the competition doing? You can bet they are all going to SMT too, if that is the way the larger electronics industry is going/has gone. So if people don't want MOTM because it uses SMT, they 'll have nowhere else to go. This is of course setting aside the whole question of whether SMT is a "bad thing" in the first place - which no one here has suggested, to my knowledge. > > Crap, next I'll hear about changing wire color effects VCF resonance > or some BS. Oh that's silly - but if you put green paint on the edge of your CDs they sound *waaayyyy* better! Dude! Try it - you'll see! > > Paul S. > I told you I was having a bad day SMT rocks! MOTM rocks!! :) Larry D. Will never mention SMT again, ever. :-)
Message
Re: [motm] Re: Possible strange question about SMT
2005-08-18 by Larry David
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.