That was a great post by Mike. I thought maybe I would explain as well what I am after with my synth, since it is somewhat different than what Mike does. My long term goal is to produce albums of synthesized music. The type of synthesis that I am interested in is the antithesis of techno or industrial type music. I am not particularly interested in rhythm. I love sounds that are pleasing to the ear, or to put it another way are aesthetic. I have spent a good deal of time studying what exactly makes a sound fall into this category. Its not just consonance, it can also involve resolving dissonance. It's about combinations of harmonics and patterns of notes and how they relate to each other. I am terribly interested in the synthesis of traditional instruments, not so much because I want to replicate them, but because I want to understand why their sound is pleasing. If traditional instruments were not pleasant sounding they would never have lasted for hundreds of years. The synthesizer is still very young, but it is certainly very capable. This is not to say that I don't like or appreciate other styles and other directions. But I have always been attrracted to music that involves building sonorities and that involves symmetry. I believe that music is something that is hardwired into the brain, and that there are certain sounds and combinations of sounds that can impart specific emotions. So, my goal when I play around with my synth is to create sounds that I can combine to produce an emotional response in the listener. Paul Haneberg
Message
Re: Patch Book
2005-05-27 by paulhaneberg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.