I had a request regarding the 120 - maybe someone else was thinking the same. Would it be possible to get some samples of what it does in terms of just adding the sub-octaves? I know, it's a boring request, but while it's nice to hear what it's theoretically capable of - full-on intermodulated extremeness - for my purposes it'd be much more useful to know what it sounds like when *just* adding the sub-octaves. Some of you might say "it sounds like the original, but with four sub-octaves" but there are sub-octaves and there are sub-octaves, if you know what I mean. just my 2 cents, Matthew --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Tom Adam <tom.adam@p...> wrote: > I was surfing the net a bit and stumbled over this link: > http://www.techman.synth.net/techman_website2_00002e.htm > copy: > "When it came to testing this module, I was a little perturbed that it > didn't work as I expected. in sub mode, turning up each of the four sub > octave pots produced glitches in the audio if I had signal on both the A > IN and B IN jacks. This couldn't be right. ... This time I happened to > put the scope probe on the non-inverting input of the input comparator, > and lo, the glitching stopped. Aha.. the capacitance of the scope probe > had stopped the clock jitter. Solution: I happened to have a couple of > 18pF ceramic caps handy, so I put these across the non-inverting input > and ground (Pins 2 & 1) of both of the 311 comparators. Problem solved. > The module now appears to work as intended...." > > Since I was experiencing the same problem, I tried it out. I needed to > take apart the whole module to be able to fit the caps, but the result > is very nice. Now I know what a MOTM-120 should sound like. Very cool! > > Cheers, > Tom
Message
Re: MOTM-120
2005-05-19 by bootlegsounds
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.