MOTM

You'll notice I used the word 'most,' as in 'most analog modules you'd 
want from a synth' as there will always be more.  And I didn't see paul 
say anywhere that he was going to make a virtual analog synth; the 
synergy doesn't quite count.  The synergy, the prophet VS/wavestation, 
etc are all patently digital synthesizers.  What gave you the idea that 
paul was going to be doing VA stuff?

-Geoff

Mike Estee wrote:

>
>On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Overand wrote:
>  
>
>>Am I the only one who lauged here?  Analog modelling digital stuff from
>>a company that already provides most analog modules you'd want from a
>>synth...
>>    
>>
>
>That's being a bit presumptuous, I can think of few that are missing.
>
>Sorry, I just don't see the utility of a VA (in the classical sense of 
>emulating circuits originally designed for opamps) in a modular synth, but 
>that's just me.
>
>I'd rather see things like arbitrary waveform generators, delay lines, 
>loopers, CV controllable reverbs, plexes, cloud oscillators and other such 
>weirdness that doesn't make sense in the analog domain, than 
>yet-another-vintage-synth-emulation.
>
>Anyway, people seem to be excited about it so that probably as good a 
>reason as any to try it.
>
>--mikes
>
>  
>