MOTM

I have an idea that's been kicking around in my head for the last 25 years:
what's the best way to
combine the strengths of both digital and analog electronics to make a
modular synthesizer.

Picture a modular analog synth. I believe the day is coming when I could
replace the analog
guts of any of the modules with one DSP-like device, programmed to provide
the function
of that module, be it filtering, envelope generation, VCO, etc. Powering up
the machine
would cause each DSP to be programmed for its function by some master CPU.
Want
another VCO? Just make one. Could also keep the programming in flash,
possibly
incorporated directly on the DSP chip. Silicon capable of doing this is
pretty much
available right now.

To capitalize on the strength of the digital part of this rig, I'm thinking
the interfaces between
modules should be digital, not analog. But I'm somewhat torn on this part --
there's something
satisfying, logical, and concrete about connecting a patch cord from the
output of one
module to the input of another. Even with digital protocols we could still
have patch
cords.

But the digital world doesn't really need 'em. You could have a very general
routing
interconnect network inside the box that allows anything to connect to
anything else.
The question is how to control that routability and how to make it readily
visible to
the machine's operator.

To really take advantage of the extreme programmability of the modules,
you'd
probably want each of them to have some kind of display that reflects the
current
function of that module. LCD displays are pretty expensive right now,
especially
the color ones that I think would be necessary to quickly distinguish the
various
modules.

Why would anyone want such a rig? Well, one major reason is that you could
get all of the "knobs" back to their exact settings later, something that I
never
could achieve with an analog synth. In fact, if the patching is done via a
routing
network, you could reconfigure the machine to precisely what it was at any
previous time. Maybe a combination of internal routing network plus patch
cords?

Anyone else ever thought about doing this?

-BobC