oops i think i got over excited on that last post and didn't read it properly, so repeat after me: Eventide H949 Harmonizer you can get them in the uk for around \ufffd250, the pitch can either be voltage controlled or clocked via a VCO i've got an H949 and i love it - i'm not too sure what facilities are available on the H910 which is far cheaper on the s/h market as far as i know, the H910 & H949 are analogue pitch shifters cheers paul (ducking this time) ----- Original Message ----- From: "paulhaneberg" <phaneber@...> To: <motm@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 6:47 PM Subject: [motm] Re: Pitch Shifter > > > There is no such thing as an analog Pitch Shifter. At least as far > as I know. I suppose one could be built if you could find a charge > coupled bucket brigade type device capable of high enough quality, > but that's unlikely. All pitch shifters are digital and break the > incoming signal into samples just like digital delays. There are > always trade offs involved in making a pitch shifter as well, as > improved pitch accuracy and improved timing accuracy are somewhat > mutually exclusive. > > I think what you are really looking for is a pitch shifter which can > accept a control voltage to control the amount that the signal is > shifted in pitch. This is also difficult to accomplish. Most > Digital Delay devices which are capable of analog voltage control > actually step between delay values rather than continuously changing > value. This tends to cause zipper noise. In order to vary the > delay (or the pitch) continuously the sample rate clock must be > voltage controlled. While not impossible, this is quite difficult. > If you are sampling at 48 kHz which would give you a maximum input > frequency of around 20 kHz, and then you wanted to either decrease > the delay time or raise the pitch by two octaves, your sample rate > clock would now be running at 192 kHz. If you slow down below 48 > kHz you will lose high end response or generate some truly nasty > artifacts, so the effective range is only about 2 octaves using > modern converters if you want to be continuously variable without > stepping. > > It may be possible to get more range with a delta/sigma scheme or by > using a flash converter with a compander. This is something I'm > personally interested in exploring, as I'm interested in the musical > applications of delay lines, but I haven't had time to play around > with any kind of circuit design yet. > > The frequency shifter is another animal entirely. The Encore > Electronics module is quite wonderful, but as someone else pointed > out a frequency shifter does not maintain the integer spacing of > harmonics present in the input signal, so it really does not shift > pitch. > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [motm] Re: Pitch Shifter
2004-12-27 by Sikorsky
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.