I admit this isn't the kind of thing I've been thinking about, but it does sound interesting! I also liked your idea about the PPL based module, but I too have heard that there are certain problems when the input frequency changes, so I'll be interested to see how this develops (and yes, I might even run audio through it if Paul isn't looking). And as I said, I REALLY liked your idea of the programmable pulse pattern sequencer (?). On a related note, I just got the Chamberlin book "Musical Applications of Microprocessors" which I've been wanting for about 15 years (don't want to rush into these things though). It's a great book, though I've only just started it! I may in the near future be asking questions about a complex audio waveform generator (I don't want to use the other "d" word) which could then be processed by the other MOTM modules -- you have been warned. Hey, I noticed Larry has avoided the Subotnick question. Ken, what's BG music (bluegrass? Belgian Grunge?)? And it sounds like you've got a great team there Paul! John Waterboy Barlow Doing my best to obscure the clarity. In a message dated 11/1/99 2:03:56 PM, oldcrow@... writes: > Tinkering with a balky piece of equipment in the lab today, my mind >wandered over to more pleasant things--such as MOTM module ideas. I had >this sudden thought about analog string synthesizers, and all at once >the complete concept for a MIDI (and probably CV in) to string voice >module popped into my head in the form of uC code, dividers, etc. > > Anybody like strings? :) >
Message
Re: In a moment of clarity...
1999-11-02 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.