The filters are different topologies, which pretty much dispels the myth that the "CS80 custom chips are integrated versions of the discrete circuits in the GX1." Both exhibit some basic similarities (the 480 is a pair of 2nd-order filters, each 485 is a single 2nd-order filter), both have specific feedback-damping to prevent self-oscillation, although I increased the adjustment on the 485 to let it introduce "bad" IM distortion, because it sounded musically useful. The bottom line is, they sound different. Yamaha must have had this great fear that a keyboard player would be able to place a filter in a state that made it appear as if the instrument was broken; things like closing the high-pass filter all the way such that no tone was heard. Thus, Yamaha built the GX1 HP-VCF to respond to 1/2 Oct/V modulation wheres the LPF was 1V/Oct. Similarly, the CS80 HP filter is hardwired to track and half the distance as the LP filter on its modulation input. On the MOTM-480, this hardwired behavior is part of the FM input (1V/Oct still tracks the same for both filters, same as in a real CS-80). Hope this helps(?) Crow /**/ On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, tontaub wrote: > That said how does a single 480 compare to a pair of 485s? > > :-) Michael.
Message
Re: [motm] Re: Update
2004-08-23 by The Old Crow
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.