MOTM

Mike Marsh wrote:

>If you don't like MOTM, but everybody here does,<


*Sigh.*  Where did I say I didn't like MOTM? If I didn't like MOTM, I 
wouldn't be BUYING it!

There are things about it I don't like (which I named) and there are 
things about it I like (which I named). 

It is funny how analog owners tend to have digital attitudes. That 
is, you are expected to love everything about a certain manufacturer 
or not to love everything. Such is not the case with me (ask Roger!). 
It is generally my practice to discuss the pros AND cons of the 
modules out there.  

>do you think Paul is going to change his entire design philosophy 
because of that?<

Don't know, though I've been working on him for years.  :-)


>Stick with your favorite manufacturer, you'll be happier in the long 
run.<

I'm happy now.  But I'd still like to incorporate modules from other 
manufacturers into my dotcom system, including MOTM (I forgot to 
mention my Stooge modules and Encore frequency shifter!)


>This smacks of troll to me.<

My opinions get me in enough trouble without trolling.  However, I 
meant everything I said in the last post. Except the part about the 
Cat o' Nine Patchcords. Perhaps.  

johnm