In a message dated 99-10-31 02:25:04 EST, you write: << long-since-discontinued chip >> i had been under the impression that there was a current producer of the chips. if not, point taken. a solid foundation of the "basics" is needed to be able to more fully exploit the abilities of the more "exotic" modules, i certainly agree there also. certainly, designing a good vco from scratch is not a trivial endevour but at least there is a substancial body of existing work / literature to build upon. a lot is subjective, too, on modulars. for example, i`m still learning the "personality" of mine. its been pretty balanced, i find stuff i like, i find stuff i don`t. here`s one most people don`t even think of - getting used to "standard" adsr`s. i come from a background where the primary envelope modules are ar`s. i`m used to combining envelopes to get more complex shapes. basic adsr`s aren`t the same thing. not bad, just different. i`d love a nice, complex envelope generator ( paul....... ). i guess my point was to just try and encourage the design of modules that are well outside the normal milieu. best, dave
Message
Re: Thinking on Mixer
1999-10-31 by DAVEVOSH@xxx.xxx
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.