Thanks for all the recommendations. That sounds like overkill all right. If the runty anachronism that I picked up for a tenth of that doesn't do the trick, I'll look into one of these. Cheers Max On 4/24/04 1:49 AM, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote: > You need a counter with a 'reciprocal time base'. Instead of gating/counting > pulses, it measures the *period* of the waveform and *calculates* the > frequency. > In typical MOTM overkill fashion, I use a Philips/Fluke model PM6666 counter > which can measure down to 0.001Hz :) and at 0.1Hz resolution make 1,000 > measurements/sec :)) > > This is a 10yr old model, I paid about $900 new but eBay has them every now > and > then for like $350. > > Paul S.
Message
Re: [motm] Frequency counter
2004-04-26 by Max Lord