Based on what I heard of the samples of the filters, I'd buy one. Especially in the 490 form factor! --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, The Old Crow <oldcrow@o...> wrote: > > It is not my intention to make a clone GX1. Building the mechanical > parts of such a machine would take far too long, for me at least, to > justify such a project. More realistic would be to convert say an EX-2 > into a sort of GX-2, and that would still be a huge project. > > I am determining the designs of the original submodules mainly out of > interest in whether the discrete circuits were the ancestors of the custom > chip set Yamaha made for the CS line. Of secondary interest is making > spare parts for instruments that used them (SY1/2, CSY1/2, GX1). > > It is not hard to adapt the design to be a panel module, so if enough > folks were interested I was going to make one. I'd like it to be MOTM > but Paul has enough to do as it is. Perhaps if I gave him a turn- key > design that used, say, the same panel layout as a 490 module, so that the > only effort he would need to provide is silkscreen of a different model > number and switch legend, and have a hole drilled for a mode select switch > (HP/LP). > > That is all up to him, though. Talking about making modules is easy. > Producing them is not so easy. > > Crow > /**/ > > On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, edibennardo wrote: > > > Is Crow's and other people's intention making a sort of GX1 clone > > available in the future? or is it just the simple intention to > > reproduce some important GX1 parts for existing not working > > instruments? I read the word "production" somewhere and this sounds > > interesting though. > > Enrico (Sicily)
Message
Re: Crow's GX1 findings
2004-03-09 by Mike Marsh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.