On Monday 09 February 2004 00:44, Paul Haneberg wrote: > but the bottom line is that any artifacts or > loss of sound quality you notice in a recording sampled > at 44.1kHz is due to the filter preceeding the A to D > converter and possibly the lowpass filter following the D > to A converter to a lessser extent. I see! Good explanation. > My studio uses an Apogee AD8000 SE converter and yes > these are very expensive. But I cannot hear the > difference between using this converter at 44.1 kHz and a > ProTools HD converter running at 192kHz. That's quite a claim! I'm impressed. > I record from the MOTM straight into the converter, > after passing the signal through a very good transformer > to make it Lo-Z. Maybe this is getting a little too off-topic, but good you (or someone else) explain me this Hi-Z/Lo-Z thing? - Robert
Message
Re: [motm] No 88.2 or 96k then?
2004-02-09 by Robert van der Kamp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.