MOTM

In a message dated 1/8/04 10:24:38 PM Central Standard Time, 
mmarsh@... writes:

> Right, VC-able is what I meant to say.  And I agree with Richard 
>  that the 320 is in fact the King of LFOs.  But for a monosynth type 
>  setup, th 390 would be enough (?)


 Another thing to consider is that the 390 has two LFOs in a 1U width, vs. 
the single LFO of the 2U width MOTM-320. Perhaps in a smaller system, the extra 
LFO and smaller width of the MOTM-390 uLFO would be more beneficial?

 Andrew