MOTM

Right, VC-able is what I meant to say.  And I agree with Richard 
that the 320 is in fact the King of LFOs.  But for a monosynth type 
setup, th 390 would be enough (?)

Mike - now re-learning how to type

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Richard Brewster <pugix@n...> wrote:
> I think Mike meant to say that one of the two LFOs in the 390 is 
> *voltage controllable*.    Only the 320 has the sync feature.
> 
> My recomendation on module selection is to start with one of each 
> different type of module and decide later, after using them, which 
ones 
> you want duplicates of.  I have two each of a lot of MOTM modules, 
> including the 300, 310, 320, and 390.  The 300 and 310 are the 
same high 
> quality VCO, but the 300 adds more features.  Now I think the 320 
and 
> 390 LFO modules are really quite different from each other.  The 
390 is 
> great for your basic LFO needs.  And the 320 is in a class by 
itself, 
> the "king" of LFOs.  So I suggest one of each to start.
> 
> One more piece of advice.  You are very likely to end up with a 
lot more 
> modules than you thought you would ever get.  :)  Thank goodness 
these 
> are *modular*.  The case and power supply options will work 
themselves 
> out as you grow your synth.  Just plan on growing.
> 
> -Richard Brewster
> 
> Mike Marsh wrote:
> 
> >3) The 390 is a great LFO!  You'll be happy with it.  The 
advantage 
> >the 390 has over the 320 is that it has two separate LFOs, and 
one is 
> >sync-able.
> >
> >More food for thought!
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >  
> >
> >  
> >