On Thursday 08 January 2004 18:24, cormallen wrote: > Another thing to be aware of is that 310s tie up another > module when doing PW stuff since they don't have a PW > knob of their own. > > Also, for LFO-driven PWM, you normally need an attenuator > somewhere since otherwise the LFO will take the 310 out > of the useful range of PW (eg. it'll go silent > periodically. Fine when you want that, but mostly you > don't). Both good points. > > My advice would be to go for at least a couple of 300s > before getting any 310s. I slightly regret getting any > 310s at all (I have two of each type), but for people > with larger (or mobile) rigs, I can see the space-saving > advantage. Understood, thanks. - Robert
Message
Re: [motm] Re: 300 versus 310
2004-01-08 by Robert van der Kamp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.