--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Tony Karavidas" <tony@e...> wrote:
the control knobs, my vote is still for version 4a.
As to the control knobs, my preference is no detents.
For "numbering" around the big knob, I would be fine with just a "-"
and a "+" at either end :) But if you want to do actual numbers, I
won't object.
It would be really really cool if you could use a high quality *panel
mounted* pot for the coarse frequency knob. (One with minimal play in
the shaft - something like the Spectrol pots used in the MOTM VCO for
frequency.)
For all of the other pots, I am fine with whatever you normally use.
(Panasonic PCB mounted types or whatever.)
seth
>Even though I like the idea of having the outputs stacked up to match
> One panel was submitted to me in the past few minutes and I posted
> it on the site.
the control knobs, my vote is still for version 4a.
As to the control knobs, my preference is no detents.
For "numbering" around the big knob, I would be fine with just a "-"
and a "+" at either end :) But if you want to do actual numbers, I
won't object.
It would be really really cool if you could use a high quality *panel
mounted* pot for the coarse frequency knob. (One with minimal play in
the shaft - something like the Spectrol pots used in the MOTM VCO for
frequency.)
For all of the other pots, I am fine with whatever you normally use.
(Panasonic PCB mounted types or whatever.)
seth