MOTM

So far we have 5 people for #4 and 16 people for #4a. I think 4A is clearly
the winner even if we get a bunch more people voting this weekend.

Someone brought up another issue privately and I wanted your thoughts as
well.

The UEG grid and the FS grid are the same
See this photo http://www.encoreelectronics.com/FS/FreqShift_Proto5.jpg for
a pack of them together.

Remember the right hand column on the FS is a little too far to the right,
but with that in mind, it was brought to my attention that the right FS
column and the Left UEG column are probably too close for comfort if they
were mounted together like that.

I see his point because the vertical spacing of the UEG knob columns require
the thumb and finger to be left and right of the knob (instead of top and
bottom or free flow around the knob) UEG knobs Rate3, Rate5, and Rate7 would
be hard to grab if the two modules are mounted next to each other.

OTOH,  I think it looks better this way, with the caveat of the preceding
paragraph.

Here are my questions: 
Do you care or do you like that symmetry between the modules? 
If you like the symmetry, would a solution be to not mount the modules
together.
If  I nudged in the left and right column of knobs on the FS, would that
still look OK?

A pack of replies would be great to receive quickly...I'm trying to do this
new board this weekend.

Tony