My 2c: I like this. Of course, you're adding cost to the product with more hardware. The large initial frequency control ideally should be a 10-turn type, but I don't think they make those for PCB-mount. From a PCB design pov, I don't like the position of the Freq CV pot. It upsets the already premium board real estate. If this board is like the UEG's then the overall size is about 3"x6". While Tony has the advantage of placing components on both sides, this narrow form factor really puts the squeeze on the balance between control ergonomics and PCB parts arrangement. The best thing to do with this pot is line it up with the gain and fine shift controls. This at least gives an unrestricted rectangle for parts in the center of the board. Crow /**/ On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, strohs56k wrote: > circuitry) but you could fix the jack field symmetry like this: > > http://www.eskimo.com/~strohs/FSlayout3a.GIF
Message
Re: [motm] Re: Frequency Shifter (improved layout idea)
2003-11-06 by The Old Crow
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.