----- Original Message ----- From: alt-mode <yahoo@...> OK Everybody, let's all take a deep breath and keep our cool. It isn't fun seeing folks I respect start to have it out in public. Thanks Eric. I hope no one sees my post as mean spirited. However, I think it is important to be honest with Tony providing feedback when he asks for "group question" in a public forum. In modular synthesis, UI is very important to users. I have well over 1000 Stooge panel sales and thousands of PCB bracket sales that prove people will go through what is no doubt a huge pain in the ass to reformat modules to meet their UI needs. And, then there is that Schaeffer thing... :) > I also don't see this module as a potential stooge modification again because the pot mounting is integral to the board (look at the back of a UEG to see what I mean). Certainly it would be a challenging modification mounting pots and jacks off board. It would be a shame actually to do that to what I am sure will be a well constructed module. > Regarding the schematics, it is Tony's prerogative to keep them private and we should respect that. It is his design and intellectual property and no one should be dis'ing him for wanting to protect it. Well, we will just have to peacefully disagree here. Once the unit is out of warranty, I should be able to choose my service options. I have that choice with my other stuff. But, I do understand. I just don't have to agree with it. Everyone will make their own choices. > Perhaps we have become a bit spoiled with the current choices offered these days. I am 100% in agreement with you there. In fact, I will now retract all my statements and say this is all Paul's fault. If he did not make such good stuff and hold his customer's input in such high reguard, we might not be so demanding of the rest of the world. So, ignore the Stooge behind the curtain. Lack of schematics and other documentation necessary for future service has already determined my purchase decision. So, I should really shut up. Larry
Message
My last post on the subject. Frequency Shifter group question
2003-11-05 by J. Larry Hendry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.