MOTM

Looks to me there is room for a 8-pot arrangement with standard size knobs 
like the MOTM-480

http://www.synthtech.com/motm480.html

The LEDs could be fitted in somehow.  This assumes that at least four of 
the pots would be panel-mounted with wires running to the circuit board.  I 
am wondering if one reason for Tony's layout is that the pots are to be PCB 
mounted.

-Richard Brewster

At 04:37 PM 11/4/03 -0800, Tony Karavidas wrote:
>One of the reasons for the knobs to be in the location they are currently in
>is the fact that I created a grid of knob positions on the UEG, and these
>fall within that grid as well. So it's not arbitrary. It wasn't arbitrary in
>the UEG either. I was trying to maximize the spacing when trying to fit 8
>knobs and a jack in a column.
>
>
>Tony
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: elle_webb [mailto:elle_webb@...]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:35 PM
>To: motm@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [motm] Re: Frequency Shifter group question
>
>--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Tony Karavidas" <tony@e...> wrote:
> > My inclination is to leave it basically as show here:
> > http://www.encoreelectronics.com/cont_fs1.html
>
>If a panel is going to diverge from the MOTM standard, it ought to be
>distinctive, improve functionality, or be a necessary compromise.
>
>This panel looks arbitrarily different to my eyes, and the smaller knobs
>don't make sense. This module cries out to be "stooged"!