One of the reasons for the knobs to be in the location they are currently in is the fact that I created a grid of knob positions on the UEG, and these fall within that grid as well. So it's not arbitrary. It wasn't arbitrary in the UEG either. I was trying to maximize the spacing when trying to fit 8 knobs and a jack in a column. Tony -----Original Message----- From: elle_webb [mailto:elle_webb@...] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: motm@yahoogroups.com Subject: [motm] Re: Frequency Shifter group question --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Tony Karavidas" <tony@e...> wrote: > My inclination is to leave it basically as show here: > http://www.encoreelectronics.com/cont_fs1.html If a panel is going to diverge from the MOTM standard, it ought to be distinctive, improve functionality, or be a necessary compromise. This panel looks arbitrarily different to my eyes, and the smaller knobs don't make sense. This module cries out to be "stooged"! ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/VpLolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
RE: [motm] Re: Frequency Shifter group question
2003-11-05 by Tony Karavidas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.