--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Tony Karavidas" <tony@e...> wrote:
be distinctive, improve functionality, or be a necessary compromise.
This panel looks arbitrarily different to my eyes, and the smaller
knobs don't make sense. This module cries out to be "stooged"!
> My inclination is to leave it basically as show here:If a panel is going to diverge from the MOTM standard, it ought to
> http://www.encoreelectronics.com/cont_fs1.html
be distinctive, improve functionality, or be a necessary compromise.
This panel looks arbitrarily different to my eyes, and the smaller
knobs don't make sense. This module cries out to be "stooged"!