MOTM

Adam S. wrote:

>I sort of understand your point, but not entirely. "noisy" and "CD 
quality" are not mutually exclusive. Many people make CDs of noisy 
equipment. Is a recording of a Buchla system automatically not "CD 
quality"? Or of an ARP 2600? If so, then a great number of CDs in my 
collection must not be "CD quality".<

By your argument, however, EVERY synth could market itself as being 
of "CD Quality."  It that is the case, then Synthtech's claim has no 
merit, as it could be argued that CD Quality lies in the way the 
recording is made and not in the design of the modules.

johnm