MOTM

Er, not only opinionated but a rotten speller.  I meant 'mixers' 
not 'mxers'...

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Marsh" <mmarsh@w...> wrote:
> Horse manure.  It'll only make your life easier if you do Konkuro-
> style patches (not a bad thing, mind you).  Experiment and find 
what 
> works for you.  For me, some things work grouped by function, 
others 
> do not.  I have mults, mxers and lfos scattered throughout my rig, 
> but oscillators and filters grouped.  Go figure, but it works for 
me.
> 
> Mike, also strongly opinionated
> 
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "konkuro" <konkuro@a...> wrote:
> > >So how does one arrange modules such that over time, one spends
> > more time making glorious noises and an ever-decreasing amount of 
> time
> > learning how to use the system? Thank you in advance.<
> > 
> > Modules should always be grouped by function.  Do you hear me?  
> > ALWAYS. Do not listen to anybody else on this.
> > 
> > Signal flow should be left to right 
> > (generation>modification>amplification) and top to bottom 
(control 
> > modules on the bottom). Diagrams should follow the same scheme.
> > 
> > Do this and life will be a LOT easier.
> > 
> > Konkuro has spoken (as he does so very often).
> > 
> > johnm