MOTM

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Speth, John" <john.speth@c...> wrote:
> > e) the uSeq CPU design is being redone to provide a feature 
> > that is needed in the long run, but I
> > was going to leave out in the initial shipment: sysex updates 
> > of the code.
> 
> SYSEX updates!  YES!  Wonderful decision.  I'll happily wait.
> 

Yes, absolutely!!

  :-))) Michael Z.