That code is still being written, so I don't know if you can abuse it the way you are hoping (which is, a fast-responding MIDI clock generator from a variety of external sources. That's NOT the indented use, so don't be disappointed if you have to be 'gentle' to it). Paul S. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sikorsky" <vulture.squadron@...> To: <motm@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 6:53 AM Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Dr. T vs the uSeq > hello all, > > > a) you feed in a min. +-3V pk-pk waveform. Square/pulses will work the > best. > > b) you have to feed in 2 pulses to "get it going", because...... > > c) the PIC times the interval between successive pulses, calculates the > BPM, and uses THAT to > > generate MIDI clock. > > so the tempo is re-calculated every second pulse..? > does it trigger on rising or falling waveforms..? > so a square wave LFO with pwm would be a mess, unless it was a very very > slow pwm..? > > i can see this function alone is going to be great fun (though possibly not > for the neighbours) > cheers > paul b > sheffield > uk > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [motm] Re: Dr. T vs the uSeq
2003-06-24 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.