"WALK" does not sound useless to me. That sounds like the "drunk" module in max/msp which is used in almost everybody's patches. At first I was wigged out too by the idea of a sequencer with hardly any UI for programming pitches. But all you have to do is hit two buttons and bang the notes you want in order on a midi keyboard, right? And then they play back in tempo perfectly quantized? I think I can get used to that. Max --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "konkuro" <konkuro@a...> wrote: > Paul wrote: > > >Good thing the MOTM-600 uSeq can do stuff like this, and more! > The 'WALK'function is VERY cool (it 'flips a coin' and randomly goes > 1 step above or below the current position > in the sequence).< > > Er.... > > That sounds like a rather useless feature. I mean, what's the point? > > johnm (who otherwise finds the uSeq rather tempting...)
Message
Re: Dr. T vs the uSeq
2003-06-24 by rreprobate
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.