Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: Dr. T vs the uSeq

2003-06-24 by rreprobate

"WALK" does not sound useless to me. That sounds like the "drunk"
module in 
max/msp which is used in almost everybody's patches.

At first I was wigged out too by the idea of a sequencer with hardly
any UI for 
programming pitches. But all you have to do is hit two buttons and
bang the 
notes you want in order on a midi keyboard, right? And then they play
back in 
tempo perfectly quantized? I think I can get used to that. 

Max


--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "konkuro" <konkuro@a...> wrote:
> Paul wrote:
> 
> >Good thing the MOTM-600 uSeq can do stuff like this, and more! 
> The 'WALK'function is VERY cool (it 'flips a coin' and randomly
goes 
> 1 step above or below the current position
> in the sequence).<
> 
> Er....
> 
> That sounds like a rather useless feature.  I mean, what's the
point?
> 
> johnm (who otherwise finds the uSeq rather tempting...)

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.