>> I think it's pretty interesting to watch someone modify a large > complicated modular synth in realtime to generate new and interesting > sounds.< > > But that's not performing; that's twiddling. I think your definition of performing involves instruments that play notes. This probably excludes things like turntablists, trigger samplers, faders, and knob twiddlers. No offense ment here, but I think that's a rather limited view of what constitutes a performance. Knob twiddling and turntablism are about "a sound" and the qualitative value of a sound. Not notes. This is something that seems to be hard for people to wrap their heads around, especially the older generation that didn't grow up with it. To get a real appreciation for this I suggest trying it. It's a lot harder than it looks.... > I honestly don't mean any disrespect to RR--I just don't get it. Can > you imagine somebody actually *writing* and performing 80 minutes of > music? Yes, I can. 80 minutes, if you've ever performed live, is a flash in the pan. You set up a basic structure that binds the set together, and then you improvise to the crowd and the moment. It's intoxicating. > It would be a monumental task--like Bach's B Minor Mass or > something. Why would people travel long distances to hear a sequencer > go chugga-chugga-thump-thump with a twiddle here and there? I don't think you will find the answer to that in a news group. If you truly are interested I suggest finding some electronic acts and see them play live. i highly recommend the Orb, Dub Tribe, Simon Posford (in various forms), and the Chemical Brothers. They're all knobs twiddlers (and some keyboardists) but they can bring the house down. > I love the recording quality of "Bestiary" (it is so clean you can > eat off of it) but where's the structure? I just hear a lot of > amorphous sound effects and droning--and that quickly grows tiresome. The structure is in the sounds. If you're looking for arp lines, highly rhythmic structure and chords then this music is probably not for you, there is plenty to cover that realm. If you can let go of of the traditional western music structure for a moment and instead think "music as qualitative sound" you might find whole new realms to explore. I like bestiary for the same reason I like "Lifeforms" by Future Sound of London. Because it creates another "world" of sound. I like hearing new stuff. > johnm (not making trouble--genuinely confused) I will forever be fascinated by the short comings of communication via email. So much is lost with out the vocal and facial expressions. If you truly are interested in finding out, go exploring. Trying a concert you wouldn't normally like/enjoy/go to and try to get in the audiences head. I went to a Suicidal Tendencies concert once.... it was.... interesting. ^_^ --mikes
Message
Re: Robert Rich in Asheville & Techniques
2003-06-22 by Mike Estee
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.