In a message dated 10/22/99 6:31:38 PM, jlarryh@... writes: >Hmmm. The Super Reverb I remember was all in one, not a head with separate >cabinet. And, it had 4 10" speakers instead of 12". I have never seen >the >separate Super Reverb head. The Super Reverb I remember really rocked. Yes, yes and YES! That "old" (not by Fender standards) Super is really great, though you already knew that. I know nothing about the separate head Super, or a 4 X 12 cabinet for that matter -- it seems a bit early for Fender to have wanted to compete with half stacks. I don't have any of those "Amps of the Stars!!!!" books, but I do have a big technical tube amp book called: "The Tube Amp Book 4.1th Edition" by Aspen Pittman. It shows several schematics for Super and Super Reverb amps. The tube list for the Super Reverb is 4 - 7025, 2 - 12AT7, 1 6L6 duet, and possibly a 5U4. Does that look familiar? I'm assuming it's a silver face too. The Supers I'm familiar with were 40 watts (I think) at 2 ohms with the 4 10s in parallel, so the 4 12 cabinet isn't a stretch (and I like 12s too, especially Celestions or Jensen Special Designs). I believe Fender used Jensens in the old days, JBLs in the 60s and in their high end models, and a lot of "Fender" speakers in the 60s and up. And of course the typical heads are Bassman and Bandmaster, but you knew that too. >The cabinet that came with the Dual Showman you thought you were getting >actually had two 15" speakers. That was the only dual 15 cabinet I ever >saw made especially for guitar. I seem to remember that Dick Dale may have had a lot to do with the development of the Dual Showman, like Townshend and the Marshall, so the 15 makes more sense in that respect -- my first real amp was an Acoustic 100 watt with a 15" Altec, it was the wrong amp for me. I hope someone else can help you more than I have -- of course you can always sell it to Barlow for scrap! JB
Message
Re: Got Fender amp, but......
1999-10-23 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.