MOTM

>
> Since then, many new modules have come out, and at least as many more in the
> form of DIY projects and conversions using Stooge Panels(r). The MOTM has
> evolved its own "aura."
>

A good point. I've always been curious as to why do people consider motm
panels to be a "Moog look"?  Yes, they are more similar to Moog than, say
E-mu or Buchla or EMS, but when I look at a motm panel I don't "see" Moog,
I just see MOTM.  Actually, if one is into look-a-likes, to me the motm
panel design looks closer to a Steiner-Parker Syntha-system.


> Since the subject of breaking up the uniformity 4~5 years ago was a
> resounding "no," I just can't understand why now, when we are so far along,
> it's up for discussion.
> ... then what's the point?
Possibly since it is always good (IMO) for an organization to periodically
evaluate if their ideas are still worthwhile, whether the conclusion is to
reconstruct or not.  Also, it give us customers a chance to voice an
opinion, whether they are implemented or not.

Jeff