MOTM

On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Paul Schreiber wrote:

>
> The answer is the same as planting trees: you starting thinking now about modules to ship 8, 10
> even 12 months later.
>

I would also guess that it is not simply "planting trees."  I doubt if I
am wrong (but Paul can correct me if I am), but like those of us that have
'creative components" to our 'job' I suspect that for Paul the
anticipation of designing and working out a new module is part of the
spark that keeps him interested in this motm thing.
>
> For last 20 years I keep hearing how "unique" Buchla is/was. Now I have first hand experience
> from a circuit/design point (not and audio point, however). The 292 LPG is a good jumping off
> point because it is a simple circuit that can produce complex sounds not in the "normal" Moog
> setting.
>
IMO I think this is a good direction to expand the motm line-up.  Motm has
a good line of current and publically anticipated modules (I'm including,
for example, the pan/vca), and adding module diversity, I would think,
will keep many of us still coming back for more.

Jeff