I will say that even at 10 feet away, you can instantly glance at the Buchla and see what modules are in there. However, this adds greatly to the cost and inventory headaches. I'll be the FIRST to admit: MOTM went for a simple, easy to inventory, easy to maintain mechanical design. The uniformity GREATLY helps keep the inventory and labor costs low. But Don really wasn't concerned with such trival matters :) If I had an inkling (cough cough) to come out with a smaller, compact design, the Buchla (minus the *&#%*#! slide pots) is an interesting format. Loose the banana jacks, relocate the minis, different color scheme, and you're on to something. But, compactness, as I pointed out, drives the cost way UP. And you don't want to go overboard like those Focusrite channel strips with 800 LEDs, switches, meters, etc. Don's "problem" was he was way ahead of the available technology. By the time technology caught up to him, the DX-7 blew the world up :( Ask anyone in business: we NEVER 'charge enough'. Paul S.
Message
Re: [motm] Re: Mighty MARF and VCO
2003-06-08 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.