Add me to this list. I almost always find myself dialing the attack a hair up from zero to get rid of the click, if it's controlling a VCA (110s in my case, because I haven't yet received my 190). It's not a problem, really, but I can't imagine needing a faster attack time out of an 800. --Adam > I've been wondering about this myself. I keep thinking that my VCAs > are not calibrated correctly because I get pops on fast attacks with > some patches. In a few sounds, the pop is OK because it gives > something like pick attack or click to the timbre. But with others, > even most of the time, the pop turns into distortion or some other > annoyance. With the 190 in exponential mode, things is plenty fast, > rise-wise. > > I guess I'm missing something here, too. > > Mike > > --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "mate_stubb" <mate_stubb@y...> wrote: >> Just curious: >> >> Do people really need more snappy attack times than the stock 800 >> offers? I find that I have to back the attack time off to keep from >> popping a VCA, especially if using the exp response of the 190. And >> since I can get a satisfying 'knock' sound when sweeping a filter >> with no attack, no decay, why would you need something faster? >> >> Moe > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [motm] Re: 800 time
2003-05-14 by Adam Schabtach
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.